Is Iran Plotting Major Terrorist Attacks In The U.S.?
FORECASTS & TRENDS E-LETTER
IN THIS ISSUE:
1. A Chilling Article From “Accuracy In Media”
2. Media Attack Rep. Curt Weldon Over New Book
3. Is Iran Planning Major Terror Attacks In U.S.?
4. CIA Says Weldon’s Sources Are Not Credible
5. Who Is Right? Sadly, We May Find Out The Hard Way
I am on vacation this week, so I will reprint below excerpts from an article just published by the Accuracy In Media (“AIM”) organization that I think you will find both interesting and disturbing. As you will read below, some intelligence indicates that Iran is planning major new terrorist attacks in the US.
The chilling evidence is revealed in a new book by US House Representative Curt Weldon (R-PA) entitled: Countdown To Terror: The Top Secret Information that Could Prevent the Next Terror Attack In America… and How the CIA has Ignored It. Rep. Weldon is the current Vice Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee and the Homeland Security Committee. Yet his new book is being viciously attacked by the media. You need to know why.
Everyone who receives this E-Letter should read this article carefully. And given its implications, I am pulling my copyright. Feel free to share it with others.
As a reminder, AIM is a media watchdog group that I have referenced many times in my discussions about media bias. It’s one of my favorite sources. I am very impressed with AIM because they tell it like it is. They were also among the very few journalistic organizations that actually opposed passage of the Media Shield Law that I recently wrote about.
I encourage you to regularly visit the AIM website at www.aim.org to discover what the mainstream press is telling you that is biased, misleading, or downright inaccurate, and what they sometimes don’t tell you that you need to know.
So, here is an excerpt of AIM’s report on Rep. Weldon and the terror threat in Iran. I’ll also add a few comments of my own at the end.
Media Attack Whistleblower Weldon
The attacks reflect apparent discomfort over the fact that Weldon, the vice chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, has done the kind of research that the media should be doing. The attacks also reflect media dependence on official sources in the intelligence community who have a record of failing to protect America from terrorist attack.
But one journalist broke ranks. Richard Miniter, who has reported for the Wall Street Journal and the Sunday Times of London, recognizes the value of the book and highly recommends it.
A Powerful Book
"Decision-makers, journalists and anyone interested in the single greatest threat to America, Iran, should read this fast-paced book," he says. "Even experts will learn from it. Iran is already at war with the United States, directly financing terror strikes against American soldiers and diplomats across the Middle East. As Weldon's book and a wealth of other documentation reveal, Iran is harboring bin Laden's son and some 500 other al Qaeda figures today. It has already tested missiles that have the range to hit U.S. bases in the Middle East as well as our friends in Israel. It is developing nuclear warheads to put on those Shihab-3 missiles. If you want to understand the threat from Iran, you can either read this book or read the headlines six months from now."
Weldon was interviewed by AIM editor Cliff Kincaid and WTNT-AM 570 radio host Julian Tepper on "The Tepper Show" in Washington, D.C. Letting the congressman speak for himself, this AIM Report is publishing much of this interview verbatim.
Weldon said, "The book is about information that has been found to be very credible, consistent information over the past 2 and one-half years that I have provided to the CIA after having met with George Tenet (then-CIA director) and John McLaughlin (then- deputy director). They assigned their top operations person to work with me. I was under the impression that they would take a look at this information. Unfortunately, within the first two weeks I was lied to by the CIA. The information was manipulated. And in the end, even though this information consistently was proven correct, the agency continued to ignore and not deal with this information seriously."
Weldon said the information includes
● The location of al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden (in a town in Iran).
● Iran's creation of a "Council of Nine" to coordinate worldwide terrorist activities against America and the West.
● The planning of a major terrorist attack against America.
Weldon said that, for two years, he fed raw intelligence to the CIA, including material from a source Weldon called "Ali."
"I continued to feed this information, some of it very provocative, as outlined in my book," he explains. "To make sure I wasn't going overboard with it, a friend of mine, Dr. Peter Pry, who worked for the CIA for 10 years, joined me in this process."
Where Is The CIA?
Weldon said, "He actually went with me twice to Paris to meet with Ali and others. He knew what to ask and how to approach it. He knew how to judge the sources. He said, 'I don't understand why the agency is not aggressively working with him.' Many of the things he told us months in advance of when they occurred actually did occur."
As one example, Weldon said that Ali told him in May 2003 in writing that Iran was going to attack the U.S. using a cell of 19 Pakistanis that would fly a commercial plane into a U.S. nuclear reactor.
Planned Attack On Reactor
"He said the reactor began with the letters S-E-A, which could have been Seattle or Seabrook [New Hampshire]," Weldon said. "In July 2003 he came back and said it was Seabrook. All of that was fed to the CIA. On August 22, 2003, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police in Canada broke up a 19-member Pakistani cell that had ties to al Qaeda. They had no identifiable means of income, yet one had $40,000 in a bank account.
"Two of them were arrested at 4 o'clock in the morning for trespassing at a nuclear power station in Canada. They said they were simply walking on the beach. Another of the 19 we found out had been taking flying lessons and had been practicing flying over a reactor in Canada. They had all kinds of paraphernalia confiscated by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. It was exactly as Ali had told me it would be. The difference was that he told me the attack was going to be on November 24, 2003, and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police broke up the cell on August 22, 2003. You can't get much more specific than that. There's no way that could be a coincidence."
In another case, Weldon was told two years ago—before it became an issue in the press—that Iran was conducting a crash program to develop a nuclear bomb. The information included revelations that Iran had dispatched agents to North Korea to acquire nuclear materials.
Even more ominously, Weldon received information that Iran's Ayatollah Khameni had received a "vision" of the Twelfth Imam, the holiest figure in the Koran, ordering him to attack America on U.S. soil.
Weldon said that he chose to write the book partly because he thought that going public with the information would cause the Iranians to postpone their scheduled attack on America.
"I could have gone to anyone in the media for the past two years and given them any one of a number of stories and reporters would have loved to have this information. But I didn't do that. I kept it to myself," he said. "Being a vice chairman of the Armed Services Committee and vice-chairman of the Homeland Security Committee, I have a leadership position on security issues."
Indeed, it is unprecedented for a sitting member of Congress of such high rank to go public with such information. But rather than be welcomed as a whistleblower, he has been savagely attacked by the New York Times and the Washington Post.
Weldon's letters to the editor of both publications, which have not been printed, tell the story.
Weldon's letter to the editor of the Washington Post:
"Dana Priest's article (June 9, 2005) on my book Countdown To Terror: The Top-Secret Information That Could Prevent The Next Terrorist Attack On America…and How the CIA Has Ignored It is grossly inaccurate on what little of my book is described. Priest also gives the false impression that she interviewed me, when she did not. Priest neglects my book's credible evidence on: Iranian support to the Iraqi insurgency, Iranian support of Bani Sadr, Iranian backing of an assassination attempt against the Ayatollah Sistani, Iran's crash A-bomb program, and Iran's support and direction of an ongoing plot for a major terrorist attack on the United States.
"Ms. Priest misleads readers into thinking that I support a war against Iran, when in fact I do not. My book specifically recommends against military action against Iran. Ms. Priest's breathless reporting that CIA disagrees with my book should come as no surprise to anyone who reads the title. For two years I have sought, and CIA has failed to provide, any credible evidence that the source cited in my book is lying, and has failed to explain why his warnings so often come true. In effect, CIA has merely told me, as they told reporter Priest, 'Trust us.'
"After the CIA's long record of monumental intelligence failures, also described in my book but unreported by Ms. Priest, Congress needs more than CIA's mere assertion that they are on the job and can be trusted because of their superior intuition. CIA's failure after two years to provide a factual analysis to support their dismissal of the above intelligence is reason enough to enact the sweeping intelligence reforms proposed in my book, and that are the book's most important purpose, ignored by Ms. Priest.
"My door remains open to CIA to provide me with sound, factually substantiated reasons, for ignoring the terrorist threats to the United States described in my book."
Weldon's letter to the editor of the New York Times:
"NYT reporter Scott Shane used his exclusive interview with me (June 9, 2005) to do a hatchet job on my reputation and to allow the CIA to disinform the public about my new book, Countdown To Terror: The Top-Secret Information That Could Prevent The Next Terrorist Attack On America…and How the CIA Has Ignored It. The article virtually ignores the content of my book, wrongly asserts that the terrorist plot to attack the Seabrook Nuclear Reactor is the 'strongest argument,' ignores the evidence that the 'Toronto 19' were terrorists, and fails to explain the politics, including the Canadian Government's aversion to the war on terrorism, that led to the decision to deport, instead of prosecute, most of the suspects.
"Shane ignores the book's credible evidence on: Iranian support to the Iraqi insurgency, Iranian support of Bani Sadr, Iranian backing of an assassination attempt against the Ayatollah Sistani, Iran's crash A-bomb program, and Iran's support and direction of an ongoing plot for a major terrorist attack on the United States. Instead, Shane uses most of his article to allow the CIA to dismiss this intelligence as untrue, without offering any evidence. Mr. Shane's breathless reporting that CIA disagrees with my book should come as no surprise to anyone who bothers to read the title. For two years I have sought, and CIA has failed to provide, any credible evidence that the source cited in my book is lying, and has failed to explain why his warnings so often come true. In effect, CIA has merely told me, as they told reporter Shane, 'Trust us.'
"After the CIA's long record of monumental intelligence failures, also described in the book but unreported by Shane, Congress needs more than CIA's mere assertion that they are on the job and can be trusted because of their superior intuition. CIA owes Congress the facts, not their intuition.
"CIA's failure after two years to provide a factual analysis to support their dismissal of the above intelligence is reason enough to enact the sweeping intelligence reforms proposed in my book, and that are the book's most important purpose, virtually ignored by Shane. My door remains open to CIA to provide me with sound, factually substantiated reasons, for ignoring the terrorist threats to the United States described in my book."
Shane of the Times and Priest of the Post appear to have been following the lead of Laura Rozen, a left-wing journalist for the American Prospect magazine. Priest even referred her readers to Rozen's attack on Weldon's then-forthcoming book published in the American Prospect on April 1, 2005, commending the article. Yet Rozen never interviewed Weldon, never saw the book or even any part of the manuscript.
Rozen seems to believe that Weldon is part of a Bush administration conspiracy to feed the public false intelligence on Iran just like President Bush supposedly did in Iraq so that the Bush Administration can launch another "unjustified" war.
Rozen released the name of a former official that she assumed was Ali. Priest also cited "U.S. intelligence sources" as saying who Ali was supposed to be. Shane of the Times asked Weldon to identify the informant.
Journalist Miniter says he knows who Ali is and that he finds him credible. He explains, "Since Ali has been a source of mine, I can tell you how I established his credibility. I asked him for the names of two non-declared Iranian intelligence agents working in Europe. I passed those names to a trusted contact at a European intelligence service. A few weeks later, that service confirmed that the Iranians (whose names had never appeared in press reports) were indeed believed to be intelligence agents working under diplomatic cover. A former National Security Council staffer showed me documents that revealed that Ali's intelligence was not only accurate but had saved the lives of American soldiers in Afghanistan. So I used him as a source in my book Shadow War."
Weldon says that Rozen may have gotten the information from the CIA since she interviewed a former CIA station chief from Paris who claimed he had analyzed and dismissed Weldon's information. "He had the most to lose in this," Weldon said. "He had the most to be embarrassed about" because he didn't take the information seriously.
"But what bothered me most," said Weldon, was that the Post reporter, Priest, "never talked to me."
Weldon added, 'The New York Times writer, who I did meet with, never mentioned that [former CIA Director] James Woolsey wrote a three-page endorsement of the book and the findings, and that Jack Caravelli, who was a 20-year CIA agent and who was Al Gore's National Security Council senior member when Al Gore was vice president, wrote a letter in solid support of the book."
The evidence suggests that there is an "entrenched bureaucracy" in the CIA, as Weldon puts it, that has failed miserably in the past and is now attacking Weldon for having exposed its failures.
Weldon's book is dedicated to the intelligence analysts and agents who do good work. But he did write the book in part to show support for Porter Goss, the new CIA director, as he takes on this bureaucracy "that has been so wrong so many times that it's both laughable and disgusting."
Why The Attacks?
What motivates the media attacks on Weldon and his book? Weldon contends that reporters "like to get juicy tidbits of information" and that the upper bureaucracy of the CIA has the ability to release information to help make stories.
"In the end, they manipulate the media," notes Weldon. "And the media respond because they want those stories and they want that information. So when somebody comes out and challenges the CIA, reporters are going to rally around [the CIA] and bureaucrats will give out little tidbits of information. The quid pro quo is that reporters have to write a trash piece so that any criticism of the CIA is going to be undercut."
Problems At The CIA
And what is the core problem at the CIA? Incompetence? Or has the CIA been penetrated?
"I don't think it's been penetrated. I hope not," said Weldon. "It's arrogance—the attitude that 'we know better than you do.' Last year, during the presidential election, one of the agents got the approval to write a book to embarrass George Bush during the middle of a campaign.
"If that's not arrogance, I don't know what is." (The book was Imperial Hubris, written at the time by an "anonymous" CIA officer later identified as Michael Scheuer)…
Click here to read the AIM Report in its entirety.
Your first reaction to this article may well be one of anger. Or confusion – how could this be? But like most things, there are two sides to this story. The CIA maintains that it knows Rep. Weldon’s source - “Ali” – complete with his real name, and that this individual and his associates are simply not credible. Further, that these individuals are not well connected enough in Iran to have access to high-level intelligence, and are simply peddling bogus intelligence information to whoever will buy it – in this case, Weldon.
Now that our various intelligence agencies are sharing information, it would seem to me that they would have looked into the intelligence brought forth by Weldon by now, and that they would have made their own assessments. To my knowledge, none of these other agencies have made any public statements on Weldon’s assertions.
So at the end of the day, we don’t know how seriously to take Weldon’s information. In my view, there is no question that Iran is a serious threat. Certainly, there is support for the insurgency in Iraq coming from Iran (as well as Syria and elsewhere).
There is no question that Iran is seeking to further develop its nuclear program. On June 26, Iran’s new president-elect, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, announced his plans to restart the nuclear program and warned the West not to interfere. As this is written, reports are coming out of Iran that they have, indeed, restarted their processing of uranium.
AP is reporting that some countries are now calling for Iran’s nuclear policy to be taken up by the UN Security Council for the purpose of possible economic and/or political sanctions. I’m sure this has resulted in fear and trembling on the part of Iran’s leadership, considering how effective UN sanctions were against Iraq, and how easily Saddam Hussein manipulated the Oil For Food program.
At present, Tehran maintains that the conversion process is only intended to produce fuel for generating electricity. Hmmm…seems like North Korea said exactly the same thing. Am I the only one wondering why a nation sitting on top of some of the largest oil and gas reserves in the world needs a nuclear energy program?
Obviously, this is a topic we’ll have to revisit in the near future.
Very best regards,
Gary D. Halbert
Iran Rejects Europe’s Nuclear Deal
ANWR Option Still Up For Debate In Congress
Why Suicide Attackers Haven’t Hit US Again
[Hillary] Clinton Is Cultivating an Image as a Centrist
Forecasts & Trends E-Letter is published by ProFutures, Inc. Gary D. Halbert is the president and CEO of ProFutures, Inc. and is the editor of this publication. Information contained herein is taken from sources believed to be reliable but cannot be guaranteed as to its accuracy. Opinions and recommendations herein generally reflect the judgement of Gary D. Halbert (or another named author) and may change at any time without written notice. Market opinions contained herein are intended as general observations and are not intended as specific investment advice. Readers are urged to check with their investment counselors before making any investment decisions. This electronic newsletter does not constitute an offer of sale of any securities. Gary D. Halbert, ProFutures, Inc., and its affiliated companies, its officers, directors and/or employees may or may not have investments in markets or programs mentioned herein. Past results are not necessarily indicative of future results. Reprinting for family or friends is allowed with proper credit. However, republishing (written or electronically) in its entirety or through the use of extensive quotes is prohibited without prior written consent.